ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice
Injury Risk Factors of the Tennis Serve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Injury prevalence and characteristics among tennis coaches in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A key stroke in tennis is the serve. It is the most strenuous stroke in the game and has the greatest potential for injury. The serve has been broken down into a number of key stages to allow analysis of the movements involved. Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of all injuries related to the stages of the tennis serve and to assess their relative impact on the risk of injury using a meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across 8 electronic databases, supplemented with searches of grey literature. Eligible studies presented data from injured (injury group) and uninjured (control group) tennis players in a form that allowed further analysis of each risk factor for comparison. All results were presented as effect sizes (Cohen's Results: A total of 29 studies were included in the meta-analysis, identifying 130 risk factors. 36 risk factors had an effect size suggesting a large or significant association with injury in tennis players ( Conclusion: Meta-analysis identified dominant shoulder rotation strength, internal rotation range of movement, weekly tennis volume, age, body mass and height as risk factors for injury in the tennis serve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.