ArticleHealth science reports2025
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Individual Risk Prediction of Stunting in Ethiopia: A Predictive Modeling Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Stunting Beyond Borders: Lessons From an Ethiopian Model and Pathways for Global Application.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Individual Risk Prediction of Stunting in Ethiopia: A Predictive Modeling Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Stunting is a height for age Z score falls bellow -2 standard deviation. Untreated stunted cases have lifelong consequences like cognitive development, increased risk of infection and long-term health and economy burden. Although stunting remains highly prevalent in Ethiopia, there has been no prior attempt to develop an individualized risk prediction model. This study will develop and validates a predictive model to improve targeted intervention in Ethiopia. Methods: Data from 2019 Mini Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey comprised of 2079 children's below 2 years. Data analysis was done using STATA version 17 and R version 4.4.1 software. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to select variables for Multilevel Multivariable Analysis. Nomogram was developed and model's performance was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration plots. Bootstrapping techniques were applied to internally validate the accuracy of the model. Additionally, decision curve analysis was conducted to examine its clinical and public health applicability. Results: The prevalence of stunting was 27.8% [95% CI: 24.96, 30.89]. The developed nomogram comprised 8 predictors: Maternal education, residence, sex a child, age of a child, Current feeding status, usage of bottle feeding, twin status and marital status. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the original model was (AUC = 0.722, 95% CI; 0.698, 0.747) whereas the after bootstrap model produced prediction accuracy of an AUC of 0.719 (95% CI; 0.693, 0.744). Internal validation was performed using the bootstrapping method, demonstrating reasonably corrected discriminative ability. Decision curve analysis showed that the model provided a greater net benefit than strategies of treating all or none, particularly for threshold probabilities exceeding 19%. Conclusion: This study developed and internally validated a predictive model for stunting in children under 2 years in Ethiopia, with strong discriminatory power (AUC 0.729) and calibration. The model, incorporating eight key predictors, offers a practical tool for clinical decision-making through a user-friendly nomogram.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.