Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049883›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Effect of Advertising Exposure on Responses of Young Non-e-Cigarette Users to Banning Flavors in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Xiaoyang Lv, Duo Yan, Linnea Laestadius, Fernando A Wilson, Miaoqing Yang, Adam Martin, Yang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoyang LvSchool of Public Health Peking University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-1057
Duo YanSchool of Public Health Peking University Beijing China.
Linnea LaestadiusJoseph J. Zilber College of Public Health University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee Wisconsin USA.
Fernando A WilsonMatheson Center for Health Care Studies University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA.
Miaoqing YangLeeds Institute of Health Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Adam MartinLeeds Institute of Health Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Yang WangChina Center for Health Development Studies Peking University Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: E-cigarettes, particularly those with flavors, have become increasingly popular among young people. Many countries have implemented flavor bans, though limited research has explored how non-users react to flavor bans. This research investigates the influence of advertising exposure on changes in intention to use e-cigarettes among young Chinese non-users in response to a hypothetical flavor ban. Methods: A probability-based online survey conducted from September to November 2021 included 2989 participants aged 20-34. We assessed the association between advertising exposure and change in intention to use e-cigarettes after a hypothetical flavor ban. We used propensity score weighting (PSW) to reduce potential selection bias. Results: The intention to use e-cigarettes next year among young non-users was rated highly (3.99 out of 5 points), with the flavor ban, this intention decreased by 5.8%. Females showed a greater decline in intention than males ( Conclusions: A flavor ban may have the potential to significantly reduce young people's intention to use e-cigarettes, particularly among females and those exposed to more advertising. These findings highlight the need for sex-specific approaches in tobacco control policies.

Indexed as

E‐cigarettepublic healthsexyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID41049883
PMCPMC12491848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.