Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049841›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Application and research progress of the rapid rehabilitation concept in the perioperative gynaecological period.

GaiJing Wang, Jie Cui, Xilian Wang, Yan Zhang, WeiHua Liu, HaiMei Ren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

GaiJing Wang *Department of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Jie Cui *Obstetrics Department, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Xilian WangAnesthesia Operating Room, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
WeiHua LiuGeneral Surgical Department, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.
HaiMei RenDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After 20 years of promotion and application, the concept of rapid rehabilitation (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]) has penetrated various fields of surgery and achieved remarkable results. For example, in a recent case at our hospital, a 45-year-old patient with a benign uterine fibroid underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Using ERAS protocols, she was discharged within 3 days compared with the traditional 7-day stay typically associated with open ovarian cystectomy. This highlights the potential benefits of ERAS in reducing hospital stays and improving patient satisfaction. In China, ERAS has been widely used in the fields of colorectal and hepatobiliary surgery, and related expert consensus has been formed, but it has not received sufficient attention in gynaecology. In 2016, the International Association of ERAS proposed guidelines for the application of ERAS in gynaecology/gynaecologic oncology. Therefore, to better understand and apply ERAS in gynaecology, this article reviews the progress of its application in perioperative gynaecology.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after surgerygynaecologyhospital stayspatient satisfactionperioperative period

Identifiers

PMID41049841
PMCPMC12491000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.