SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Cell-free HPV-DNA as a high-accuracy biomarker for treatment de-escalation in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of liquid biopsy in the molecular characterization of HPV-related cancers.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a devastating disease with significant morbidity and mortality, despite advances in treatment. HPV-positive HNSCC, in particular, has been increasing in incidence worldwide, yet optimal management strategies remain an unmet need. While patients with HPV-positive tumors have a better prognosis and improved response to therapy compared to HPV-negative cases, the long-term toxicities associated with standard treatments necessitate a shift toward treatment de-escalation strategies. However, the lack of biomarkers to guide patient selection for de-intensified therapy remains a critical challenge. We hypothesize that cell-free HPV-DNA (cfHPV-DNA) demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and can serve as an effective non-invasive biomarker for early detection, disease monitoring, and treatment de-escalation in HPV-positive HNSCC. This meta-analysis aims to establish the clinical utility of cfHPV-DNA in diagnosing HNSCC and its potential role in guiding de-escalation strategies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Wiley to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic value of cfHPV-DNA in HNSCC. The population included HPV-positive HNSCC patients, the intervention was cfHPV-DNA detection via liquid biopsy, and the outcome was to assess the diagnostic performance of cfHPV-DNA. The pooled diagnostic parameters were analyzed using STATA and Revman. Results: Twelve studies involving 626 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of cfHPV-DNA were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.71 - 0.96) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.91 - 1.00), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 66.55 (95% CI: 8.9 - 497.6) and 0.12 (95% CI: 0.04 - 0.33), with a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 574.73 (95% CI: 55 - 6019). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96 - 0.99), indicating exceptional diagnostic performance. Conclusion: The high diagnostic accuracy of cfHPV-DNA supports its potential as a valuable biomarker for early detection and risk stratification in HPV-positive HNSCC. Our findings suggest that cfHPV-DNA could provide a real-time, non-invasive tool to monitor treatment response and disease progression, allowing for personalized de-escalation approaches. Furthermore, we discuss the necessary steps toward FDA approval, emphasizing the need for standardized detection methods and large-scale validation studies to facilitate its integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.