ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2026
How may complementary magnetic resonance imaging findings facilitate the diagnosis of inflammatory hand arthritis involving the distal interphalangeal joint? A prospective cohort study.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we aimed to characterize the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in making a specific diagnosis of inflammatory hand arthritis (IHA), particularly in early stages or ambiguous cases.
methodsPatients aged ≥18 years with suspicious IHA in at least one joint were enrolled in this single-center prospective study. Three Tesla MRI (3T-MRI) with a fine-tuned protocol was utilized, whereby differential diagnoses were made by radiologists according to the predominant involvement of synovium or synovioentheseal complex (SEC) and/or specific degenerative findings. Physical examination, laboratory findings, treatment response, and already-established classification criteria were used to reach the final diagnostic groups: psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), erosive osteoarthritis or calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease (EOA/CPPD), and arthritis with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) involvement (ADIPI) not otherwise classified into any group. Statistical analyses mainly included pairwise comparisons of MRI findings across diagnostic groups.
resultsOf 80 patients enrolled, 57 [42 women; mean age, 54 years (range, 28-79 years)] constituted the final group with eventual clinical diagnoses of 11 PsA, 14 RA, 11 EOA/CPPD, and 21 ADIPI. MRI revealed no difference between the PsA and ADIPI groups, except for nailbed enthesitis (
conclusionSEC inflammation and periarticular edema on MRI strongly predict PsA, especially in patients with DIPJ arthritis who do not meet rheumatological classification criteria. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 3T-MRI with a fine-tuned protocol enables a more accurate differential diagnosis of hand inflammatory arthritis, potentially guiding earlier and more targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.