ArticleAsian journal of urology2025
Virtual-reality robot-assisted inferior vena cava thrombectomy using virtual vascular endoscopy to identify inferior vena cava invasion.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic Retrohepatic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy with the 3C Technique: A Stepwise and Reproducible Approach for T3c Tumor Thrombus.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics profiling identify NNMT in tumor endothelium as a key regulator of CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion via the TGF signaling pathway.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- The Operative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review of Literature.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Partial or segmental inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is indicated for tumor control in patients with renal tumors invading the IVC. This study aimed to introduce a virtual vascular endoscope to assist surgeons in locating IVC invasion, formulate a surgical plan for robot-assisted IVC thrombectomy (RA-IVCT), and evaluate its potential value. Methods: The reconstruction involves building the construction of deep learning models to predict IVC invasion, which were evaluated via intraoperative findings and pathological analysis. Thirty-six patients with renal tumors and IVC thrombi who underwent RA-IVCT between June 2016 and March 2022 were included in the study. A virtual vascular endoscopy was performed based on preoperative CT findings to identify IVC invasion. Based on the extent of IVC wall invasion and the collateral situation, surgeons could decide whether to perform partial or segmental IVC resection during RA-IVCT. Results: Twenty patients were retrospectively analysed for training in virtual vascular endoscopy (the training cohort), and 16 patients were prospectively analysed to evaluate the accuracy of this technique (the validation cohort). Sixteen patients with IVC invasion underwent cavectomy, whereas six patients underwent partial IVC resection. In the validation cohort, pathological analysis confirmed the exact location of IVC invasion in eight of the nine patients, as indicated by virtual vascular endoscopy. Patients who underwent partial IVC wall resection had less lower extremity edema than those who underwent cavectomy. Conclusion: Our initial experience showed that the virtual vascular endoscopy could assist surgeons in identifying IVC invasion and creating a surgical plan for RA-IVCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.