ReviewAsian journal of urology2025
Kidney-sparing approach for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An update on current evidence.
Review in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for middle and distal ureteral tumors associated with hydronephrosis: a comparative analysis of oncological outcomes and postoperative renal function.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Review
- Liquid biopsy-guided kidney-sparing management in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: from preoperative risk stratification to perioperative surveillance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This article reviews the latest updates and outcomes of kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases to identify related English-language studies published within the last 10 years. Key search words included "upper urinary tract tumour/cancer/carcinoma", "kidney-sparing surgery or approach", "endoscopic treatment for upper tract tumour/cancer/carcinoma", "topical instillation in the upper urinary tract", and "urinary marker for urothelial carcinoma". References within the identified literature were explored and evaluated for relevance. Results: KSS is recommended for both low-risk and selected high-risk UTUC with imperative indications such as solitary kidney. Studies have shown comparable oncological outcomes after KSS including endoscopic ablation, segmental ureterectomy, and topical instillation of novel agents when compared to radical nephroureterectomy in well-selected cases. The development of novel diagnostic tools and risk-stratifying models allows optimal case selection for KSS without compromising oncological outcomes. Conclusion: Kidney-sparing approach for UTUC is an evolving and promising area in urologic oncology, driven by advances in technology, better diagnostic tools, and novel therapeutic agents. Our article provides a comprehensive review of the latest advancements and clinical recommendations. While current evidence is mainly based on retrospective studies, prospective trials are required to address important but unanswered clinical questions in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.