ReviewAsian journal of urology2025
A review based on expert opinions for robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Review in Asian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tele-robot-assisted prostatectomy: the first systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Versus Endoscopic Enucleation for Large-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is increasingly used as a surgical treatment option for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (>80 mL). However, there is no sufficient expert consensus or guidelines to guide clinical practice. We aimed to obtain expert opinions for RASP for large BPH. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in April 2024 using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Search terms were combined to construct the following search strings: (robotic) AND (simple OR benign) AND (prostatectomy). Search results were filtered by language (English only), species (human), and publication type (original article). This study used a two-phase modified Delphi approach. Results: In this expert consensus, some frequently used RASP techniques, including robot-assisted retropubic prostatectomy, robot-assisted transvesical prostatectomy, and robot-assisted urethra-sparing prostatectomy, are described. RASP offers a short learning curve for surgeons with experience in robotic surgery. Severe complications are rare in patients who undergo RASP. Conclusion: RASP technique can be recommended as a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic BPH patients with large prostate glands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.