ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Developmental screening at 18 months using the Nipissing District Developmental Screen.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01869530 (TARGet Kids!), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TARGet Kids!: Measuring Nutrition in Young Preschool Children in the Primary Care Practice Setting
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The Canadian Paediatric Society recommends an enhanced 18-month visit, including the use of a developmental screening tool to stimulate discussion with parents about their child's development, and notes the Nipissing District Developmental Screen (NDDS) is a widely used tool. We examined the predictive validity of the NDDS in children at average-risk for developmental delay and the association between positive screening and health care utilization (HCU). Methods: Using a prospective design, parents completed the NDDS at the 18-month primary care visit in Toronto, Canada. Child health insurance number was used to link with health administrative databases to collect HCU data. We calculated screening test properties using later neurodevelopmental consultation as the criterion measure and used multivariable negative binomial regression to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRR) for each HCU type. Results: Of 802 children (mean age 18 months), 35.5% screened NDDS positive. Mean age at follow-up was 8 years, 20 (2.5%) had a neurodevelopmental consultation, and 94 (11.7%) had a special paediatric consultation/assessment, including developmental and/or behavioural care. Screening test properties were: 50% sensitivity (95% CI 27%, 73%), 65% specificity (95% CI 61%, 68%), 35% false positive rate (95% CI 31%, 40%). A positive NDDS was associated with only 1 of 7 HCU types. Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of the NDDS is inadequate for a developmental screening tool at 18 months, and the false positive rate is unacceptably high. The screening test properties of other widely used developmental screening tools is discussed, noting their low sensitivity, higher specificity, and lower false positive rates. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01869530).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.