ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025
Implementing a consultation service for translating genomic research findings into the clinic: Lessons from the SickKids Genome Board.
Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Genome-wide sequencing (GWS) is now used across the breadth of pediatric research. There is a greater potential to identify unexpected, clinically relevant findings with GWS than with the targeted genetic techniques used in prior decades. Individual research teams may not have the expertise to evaluate and manage these findings. The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) Genome Board is a no-cost consultation service for researchers with questions arising from genetic aspects of their studies. Methods: We reviewed all submissions to and recommendations from the Genome Board over the first 4 years, to identify common questions, themes, and trends. Results: There were 67 submissions and a year-over-year increase in volumes. The most common request (60%) was to assess variants identified by GWS for pathogenicity, clinical actionability, and returnability to a study participant. Overall, 23 of 48 reviewed variants were recommended for clinical confirmation and return with genetic counselling. Other categories of submissions included requests to researchers from study participants to release their "raw" genomic data and for input on protocols related to clinical translation of findings. Conclusion: The Genome Board provides a generalizable model for centralized triage of clinical questions arising from genomic research at a pediatric centre. Clinicians should be aware that patient participation in genetic research studies can have downstream consequences for their healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.