ArticleJSES international2025
Regional disparities in shoulder surgery related to distribution of specialists: national database analysis.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff tears are the most common shoulder disorders requiring surgical management. In Japan, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was introduced in 2014, initially restricted to certified surgeons. While this system ensured that only trained specialists could perform reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, it may have limited access to surgery. This study aimed to analyze regional disparities in shoulder surgeries and their correlation with shoulder specialists using the national database. Methods: A retrospective epidemiological study was conducted using the Japanese national claims database and Japanese Shoulder Society (JSS) membership records (2014-2022). Rotator cuff repair (RCR), shoulder arthroplasty volumes, and incidence in each prefecture were calculated per population. Gini coefficients assessed regional disparities, and a generalized linear mixed model evaluated the correlation between JSS membership and surgical volumes. Results: RCR showed stable regional disparities (Gini coefficient remained around 0.3) over 9 years, whereas shoulder arthroplasties exhibited extreme inequality in 2014 (Gini coefficient: 0.6), improving to moderate levels (Gini coefficient: 0.3) by 2022. JSS membership distribution was moderately equitable (Gini coefficient: 0.2). Prefectures with higher JSS membership demonstrated significantly higher surgical volumes (RCR: coefficient = 0.009, Discussion: RCR exhibited moderate regional disparities, whereas shoulder arthroplasty disparities were initially extreme but stabilized as volumes increased. This trend reflects the growing accessibility of shoulder arthroplasty due to the dissemination of certified surgeons. The correlation between shoulder specialists and surgical volumes for both procedures underscores the specialization required for these surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.