ArticleJSES international2025
Repair integrity and clinical outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under low repair tension.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Excessively high repair tension negatively affects clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. This study was performed to examine the clinical outcomes and repair integrity of the rotator cuff in patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) under low repair tension (<10 N) (ie, low-tension ARCR). Methods: The study involved patients who underwent low-tension ARCR between January 2020 and December 2021. The single-row or triple-row technique was used for low-tension ARCR. We excluded 10 patients who underwent other procedures, other types of repair, or partial repair, as well as 4 patients who underwent an ultrasound evaluation of cuff integrity. Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), and clinical scores (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] shoulder score, University of California at Los Angeles [UCLA] shoulder score, and simple shoulder test [SST]), assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Structural repair integrity was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at 12 months postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistics Package for Social Science software (version 29.0.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare continuous and continuously ranked data (VAS score, ROM, JOA shoulder score, UCLA score, and SST score). A Results: This retrospective case series involved 77 patients with a mean age of 65.9 ± 9.5 years (range, 42-85 years) and a mean follow-up period of 25.3 ± 3.3 months (range, 24-38 months). All patients had a full-thickness rotator cuff tear, classified as small in 5 patients, medium in 47, large in 25, and massive in 0. The mean tear size was 506.0 ± 332.5 mm Conclusion: Low-tension ARCR resulted in a low retear rate and good clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.