ArticleJSES international2025
How does a reduction in the radial bow, in addition to a rotational deformity of the radius, affect the range of motion of the forearm: an anatomical cadaver study.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoration of Radial Bowing After Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing in Pediatric Forearm Fractures: The Importance of Bowing Location in Addition to Magnitude.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Effect of radial bowing on pronation and supination in pediatric forearm diaphyseal fractures: comparison of dominant and nondominant arms.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the anatomical effect of radial rotational deformity and reduced radial bow on the forearm range of motion (ROM) to improve outcomes in severe forearm diaphyseal fractures and malunion. Methods: Twenty upper limbs of 10 fresh-frozen cadavers were amputated at the humerus and distally at the carpometacarpal joint and examined. Soft tissues, except the interosseous membrane, articular capsule, and pronator quadratus muscle, were removed. The deformity was modeled by cutting at the maximal bow of the radial diaphysis and fixing it with an external fixator. Radial deformities of 20° and 40° in pronation and supination were modeled to assess ROM. Thereafter, a model with a reduced radial bow was created, and ROM was evaluated in addition to the rotational deformities of 20° and 40° in pronation and supination. The cadavers were divided into the normal and reduced radial bow models, and the results were evaluated statistically. Results: In both the normal and reduced radial bow models, malunion in the pronation model led to a loss of range of supination, whereas malunion in the supination model resulted in a loss of range of pronation. The reduced radial bow model showed a statistically significant 20% and 19% loss in forearm pronation and supination, respectively ( Conclusion: In addition to radial rotational deformity, a reduction in the radial bow contributes to reduced forearm rotation. Ensuring proper radial bow formation is crucial for achieving a good postoperative ROM when treating radial diaphysis fractures and malunion occurring at the maximum radius bow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.