ArticleJSES international2025
Translating humeral posture into prosthetic planning: BMI, humeral abduction resting angle, and simulated range of motion in an Altivate 135° reverse shoulder arthroplasty model.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does humeral head size predict the lateralization required to preserve near-anatomic posterosuperior rotator cuff length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?JSES international · 2026Article
- Refining Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: From Implant Design to Patient-Specific Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Forgotten Shoulder ASAP-22: a scapula-inclusive shoulder ecosystem PROM-Pilot study in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and related pathologies.JSES international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scapular notching in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is more prevalent in slim patients and less frequent in obese patients. Current arthroplasty planning software often lacks the integration of patient-specific arm positioning when aiming to predict impingement-free motion. This study hypothesizes that obese patients exhibit a more abducted humeral resting position, measured as the humeral abduction resting angle (HARA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)-HARA, and that greater abduction increases impingement-free range of motion (ROM). Methods: Standing radiographs of 141 shoulders (121 patients) were analyzed to measure HARA (humeral center line to vertical plumb line) and RSA-HARA, defined as the angle between the humeral center line and supraspinatus fossa line influenced by RSA implantation and scapular posture. A subsequent computer modeling study of 22 computed tomography scans simulated RSA-HARA positions of 0°, 15°, 30° (Altivate; Enovis, Austin, TX, USA; 36 mm and 36-4 mm glenoid heads, standard insert, jump height = 10 mm, liner stability ratio = 202%), and 20° (semiconstrained insert, jump height = 11.3 mm, liner stability ratio = 202%). The ROM parameters-extension, external rotation, internal rotation, and adduction-were compared using a 135° humeral stem and gender-specific glenoid head configurations. Flexion, abduction and extension were not recorded. Results: Body mass index showed a moderate positive correlation with HARA (R = 0.48, Conclusions: Body mass index was moderately correlated with HARA (R = 0.48) and weakly correlated with RSA-HARA (R = 0.37). A greater RSA-HARA was associated with improved impingement-free ROM. Patients with increased HARA may benefit from more retentive liners, offering stability without compromising ROM. Customizable preoperative planning software incorporating HARA, RSA-HARA, and scapulothoracic posture are important to optimize RSA planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.