ArticleJSES international2025
Sleep quality and response after rotator cuff repair, total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory anchor-derived six-month improvement thresholds for sleep quality and pain after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.JSES international · 2026Article
- Sleep quality after shoulder arthroplasty - A systematic review.Shoulder & elbow · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep disturbance secondary to shoulder pathology is a common complaint. Previous studies have shown improvement in sleep quality after common shoulder procedures. The purpose of this study was to assess sleep quality response after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR), anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Our hypothesis was that sleep disturbance is greater in degree and longer lasting in postoperative recovery after aRCR compared to shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Visual Analog Scale-Quality of Sleep were prospectively collected in consecutive patients undergoing aRCR, aTSA, and rTSA between 2018 and 2020. Sleep quality and patient reported outcome measures, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and visual analog scale pain score, were measured preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, and comorbidities were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Correlations between sleep quality metrics and patient reported outcome measures were assessed. Results: One hundred forty-one patients who underwent shoulder surgery participated in this study (aRCR: n = 34, aTSA: n = 58, rTSA: n = 49). With all shoulder surgeries pooled together, there were significant improvements in sleep quality as measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Visual Analog Scale-Quality of Sleep from preoperative to final follow-up (8.8 vs. 6.0, 55.4 vs. 75.2, Conclusion: Sleep quality improves after shoulder surgery, although the rate of recovery varies by surgical intervention. Sleep quality improves more rapidly after shoulder arthroplasty when compared to aRCR. The SANE score may be a useful surrogate metric in assessing sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.