Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049634›Full record

ReviewJSES international2025

Reverse shoulder replacement for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a current literature review.

Henry A Kuechly, Allison K Perry, Brian M Grawe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henry A KuechlyUniversity of Cincinnati Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Allison K PerryUniversity of Cincinnati Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Brian M GraweUniversity of Cincinnati Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2003 and has become one of the most performed orthopedic procedures. Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), in particular, have become a very common indication for RSA. Specifically, 3-part and 4-part fractures in older individuals with poorer bone quality and/or limited physical demands are amenable to RSA. Given the aging population, the use of RSA for the treatment of PHFs is expected to increase. However, the complex nature of PHF morphology and the multiple treatment options underscores the fact that not every patient or every PHF is indicated for RSA. Therefore, it is important to develop a thorough understanding of indications and contraindications of RSA in the setting of PHF. Overall, this procedure provides adequate functional outcome scores, range of motion, and pain control as compared to other surgical treatments for PHFs. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and critical overview of the history, indications, surgical considerations and complications, postoperative course, and future of RSA specifically within the context of PHFs.

Indexed as

Orthopedic surgeryProximal humerus fractureReverse shoulder arthroplastyShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41049634
PMCPMC12490593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.