Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049603›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Predicting falls using electronic health records: a time series approach.

Peter J Hoover, Terri L Blumke, Anna D Ware, Malvika Pillai, Zachary P Veigulis, Catherine M Curtin, Thomas F Osborne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter J HooverNational Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-3141
Terri L BlumkeNational Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Anna D WareNational Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Malvika PillaiNational Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-189X
Zachary P VeigulisNational Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Catherine M CurtinDepartment of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.
Thomas F OsborneNational Center for Collaborative Healthcare Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a more accurate fall prediction model within the Veterans Health Administration. Materials and Methods: The cohort included Veterans admitted to a Veterans Health Administration acute care setting from July 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, with a length of stay between 1 and 7 days. Demographic and clinical data were obtained through electronic health records. Veterans were identified as having a documented fall through clinical progress notes. A transformer model was used to obtain features of this data, which was then used to train a Light Gradient-Boosting Machine for classification and prediction. Area under the precision-recall curve assisted in model tuning, with geometric mean used to define an optimal classification threshold. Results: Among 242,844 Veterans assessed, 5965 (2.5%) were documented as having a fall during their clinical stay. Employing a transformer model with a Light Gradient-Boosting Machine resulted in an area under the curve of .851 and an area under the precision-recall curve of .285. With an accuracy of 76.3%, the model resulted in a specificity of 76.2% and a sensitivity of 77.3%. Discussion: Prior evaluations have highlighted limitations of the Morse Fall Scale (MFS) in accurately assessing fall risk. Developing a time series classification model using existing electronic health record data, our model outperformed traditional MFS-based evaluations and other fall-risk models. Future work is necessary to address limitations, including class imbalance and the need for prospective validation. Conclusion: An improvement over the MFS, this model, automatically calculated from existing data, can provide a more efficient and accurate means for identifying patients at risk of fall.

Indexed as

electronic health recordsfall predictionfall-risk assessmenttime series classificationVeterans

Identifiers

PMID41049603
PMCPMC12492486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.