ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025
Effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy using a depigmented, polymerized extract of cat epithelium in allergic patients: a retrospective, real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Taming pet allergens: strategies to make furry cats less allergenic.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Allergy to animal epithelium is on the rise with an estimated 26% of European adults presenting to clinics for suspected inhalant allergy are sensitized to cats, and allergen avoidance measures are often difficult to implement and often ineffective. Methods: Real-world, retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with depigmented, polymerized cat epithelium extract (Dpg-pol-cat) in adult patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis with or without controlled asthma due to cat epithelium sensitization. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effectiveness of SCIT with Dpg-pol-cat under real-life conditions, as measured by improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the validated ESPRINT-15 questionnaire 24 months after treatment initiation. Results: The study included 28 patients. The median age was 35 years and the median duration of treatment with Dpg-pol-cat was 21.8 months. All patients had a 1-day rush build-up schedule. Significant and sustained improvements in all domains of the ESPRINT-15 questionnaire were observed from month 6 to month 24 of treatment, as well as in reduction of rescue medication use and better asthma control. Specific IgG4 levels increased significantly after 24 months of SCIT, although no significant change was observed in mean anti-Fel d 1 IgG4 levels. Most adverse reactions were local and mild, with systemic reactions, all grade <2 according to the 2010 World Allergy Organization grading system, occurring mainly during the build-up phase. Conclusions: SCIT with Dpg-pol-cat proved to be effective with an excellent safety profile in this real-world study, making it a good treatment option for patients with rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma due to allergy to cat epithelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.