Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049586›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Predicting response and survival to first-line treatment with baseline [

David Ventura, Philipp Schindler, Peter Kies, Annalen Bleckmann, Michael Mohr, Georg Lenz, Michael Schäfers, Wolfgang Roll, Georg Evers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development of aAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David VenturaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, NRW 48149, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4346-2606
Philipp SchindlerWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany.
Peter KiesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, NRW, Germany.
Annalen BleckmannWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany.
Michael MohrWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany.
Georg LenzWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany.
Michael SchäfersDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, NRW, Germany.
Wolfgang RollDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, NRW, Germany.
Georg EversWest German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly malignant disease with a propensity for early progression and high mortality. The prognostic value of treatment response and survival has been verified for solely established imaging, clinical, and biochemical markers. There is a lack of evidence for the combination of those parameters with machine learning and integrated models, particularly in the context of molecular imaging. Objectives: The aim of this study was to predict early disease progression and survival using CT-based radiomic features (RF), integrating [ Design: This retrospective pilot study included 62 patients with non-metastatic and metastatic SCLC who underwent stage-based primary treatment following baseline [ Methods: A radiomics signature was generated based on the first-line treatment response by RECIST 1.1 criteria. The RF was integrated using binary logistic regression analysis with the PET parameter metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of the primary tumor and initial disease stage. The integrated model with the highest AUC for predicting early disease progression was evaluated for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in both non-metastatic and metastatic patients. Results: A single CT-based RF demonstrated predictive capacity (AUC = 0.81). Integration of the MTV and disease stage enhanced the predictive capacity (AUC = 0.9). A Youden index-based threshold of <0.62 was identified as a significant predictor of prolonged PFS: non-metastatic disease with a median PFS of 25 versus 4 months (HR = 0.072; Conclusion: A multiparametric approach based on a Radiomics model may potentially be capable of identifying patients at risk for early disease progression, PFS, and OS in non-metastatic and metastatic SCLC.

Indexed as

FDG-PETintegrated modelPFS/OS predictionradiomicsSCLC

Identifiers

PMID41049586
PMCPMC12489238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.