ArticleHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2026
Complication Profiles Leading to Revision Surgery After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.
Article in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has gained widespread recognition as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treating degenerative cervical disc disease. Over the past decade, the rate of CDA procedures has increased by a remarkable 654%. However, CDA complications can lead to a repeat procedure or can be converted to fusion. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the time of onset (early, intermediate, or late) of complications following CDA as well as the progression leading to revision surgeries. Methods: A retrospective review of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database examined complications across 9 CDA devices from January 1, 2005, to September 30, 2023. Complications were categorized by postoperative time to occurrence: early (<6 months), intermediate (6-18 months), and late (>18 months). The revision procedures were categorized as either a repeat CDA or conversion to fusion. Results: A total of 688 CDA revision cases were reviewed, with 265 cases (38.5%) reporting revision onset time (median: 12 months, interquartile range: 3-36). Migration was the most frequent complication in both the early (n = 44, 53.0%) and intermediate (n = 25, 32.1%) periods. Subsidence peaked during the intermediate period (11.5%, n = 9), while neck pain and heterotopic ossification (HO) occurred most in the late postoperative phase, at 22.5% (n = 23) and 7.8% (n = 8), respectively. The specific revision type was recorded in 509 of the revision cases; of these, 8 devices were predominantly associated with fusion (>69%), while Mobi-C showed a lower proportion of fusion revisions (16.2%). Conclusions: This retrospective review of the MAUDE database showed the timing of complications leading to CDA revision. Migration predominated in the early and intermediate phases, while subsidence peaked in the intermediate phase. In the late phase, neck pain, osteolysis, and HO become more prominent. Conversion to fusion was common across most devices. These data provide insight for clinicians to monitor patients after CDA while considering the relative frequencies of reported complications. Level of Evidence: Level IV: retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained government database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.