Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049510›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025

Sex differences in guideline-based statin utilization and recurrent events in patients with known coronary artery disease.

Agnes Koczo, Jianhui Zhu, Floyd Thoma, Maha Mumtaz, Steven Reis, Oscar Marroquin, Kathryn Berlacher, Erin D Michos, Suresh Mulukutla, Anum Saeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Agnes KoczoUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jianhui ZhuUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Floyd ThomaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maha MumtazUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven ReisUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Oscar MarroquinUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kathryn BerlacherUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erin D MichosJohns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Suresh MulukutlaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anum SaeedUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend using high-intensity statins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Guideline directed statin intensity (GDSI) implementation and ASCVD outcomes may differ by sex. We evaluated sex-based differences in GDSI use and recurrent ASCVD outcomes in a large healthcare network. Methods: Using electronic medical records, we assessed statin use and intensity in a cohort of patients with established coronary artery disease (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention) between 2010-2022. Statins were categorized into GDSI (high intensity), <GDSI (moderate or low intensity) or no statin use. Outcomes of interest included recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/TIA and all-cause mortality. Incident rates (IR) and Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) of ASCVD outcomes were calculated across statin categories, stratified by sex. Results: We amassed data from 45,949 patients, of which 31 % were women. Women had more diabetes (29 % vs 24 %) and higher low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] (94.9 ± 40.8 vs 87.6 ± 37.1 mg/dL) than men. During a follow-up period of ∼5 years, women were less likely to be started on GDSI (61.6 % vs 65.8 %, p<0.01) and achieve LDL-C<70mg/dL (41 % vs and 49 %, p<0.01) as compared to men. GDSI use lowered IRs for all outcomes in both sexes Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of patients with coronary artery disease, women were less likely to be prescribed GDSI than men and less likely to achieve guideline concordant LDL-C<70mg/dL. This was associated with a higher risk of recurrent ASCVD events in women as compared to men. More sex specific interventions are needed to ensure adequate preventive treatment for both sexes.

Indexed as

ASCVDCoronary artery diseaseSex disparitiesStatinsWomen's cardiovascular health

Identifiers

PMID41049510
PMCPMC12490523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.