Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049507›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025

Non-acute effects of passive heating interventions on cardiometabolic risk and vascular health: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Rikuta Hamaya, Yuki Joyama, Tomohiro Miyata, Shun-Ichiro Fuse, Naho Yamane, Natsuki Maruyama, Hirofumi Kanazawa, Koki Morishita, Howard D Sesso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rikuta HamayaDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Yuki JoyamaDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, NY, NY, USA.
Tomohiro MiyataDepartment of Cardiology, Biwako Ohashi Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Shun-Ichiro FuseSchool of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Naho YamaneDepartment of Medicine, Sado General Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Natsuki MaruyamaDepartment of Paediatrics, Nagano Children's Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Hirofumi KanazawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Koki MorishitaDepartment of Cardiology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Howard D SessoDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Passive heating practices, such as hot water immersion and Finnish sauna bathing, have been associated with reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in observational studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the present literature about non-acute effects of passive heating interventions on cardiometabolic and vascular health in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and Results: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to November 4, 2024. We included RCTs that assessed the effects of passive heating interventions of at least one week duration on cardiometabolic and vascular outcomes in adults. Twenty RCTs that tested interventions such as hot water bathing, saunas, hot yoga, and local heating were included in the present review, with durations ranging from 2 to 15 weeks. Our analysis found no significant pooled effects for majority of outcomes, including flow-mediated dilation, pulse wave velocity, resting heart rate, heart rate variability, fasting glucose, HbA1c, total/HDL/LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and C-reactive protein. For systolic blood pressure (SBP), the overall pooled estimate was not statistically significant (-2.46 mmHg [95 % CI: 5.02 to 0.10]; I²=60.3 %). However, subgroup analyses indicated a significant SBP reduction was confined to systemic (whole-body) heating interventions (-4.11 mmHg [-7.36, -0.86]) and in populations with underlying coronary risk or CVD (-2.52 mmHg [-4.26, -0.79]). Conclusions: Current evidence from RCTs indicates that passive heating interventions may not improve most of the cardiometabolic or vascular health markers. While a potential reduction in SBP was observed with systemic heating and among adults with coronary risk, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to high heterogeneity and limitations in the included studies.This systematic review is registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024621600).

Indexed as

Blood pressureMeta-analysisPassive heatingPreventionRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41049507
PMCPMC12490526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.