Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049485›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Under the background of the new global definition of ARDS: an interpretable machine learning approach for predicting 28-day ICU mortality in patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS.

Peijie Zhang, Shuo Yuan, Shuzhan Zhang, Zhiheng Yuan, Zi Ye, Lanxin Lv, Hongning Yang, Hui Peng, Haiquan Li, Ningjun Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peijie Zhang *Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shuo Yuan *Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Shuzhan Zhang *Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiheng YuanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Zi YeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lanxin LvDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hongning YangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hui PengDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Feng Xian People's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Haiquan LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ningjun ZhaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a prevalent clinical complication among patients with sepsis, characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. The definition of ARDS has evolved over time, with the new global definition introducing significant updates to its diagnosis and treatment. Our objective is to develop and validate an interpretable prediction model for the prognosis of sepsis patients complicated by ARDS, utilizing machine learning techniques in accordance with the new global definition. Methods: This study extracted data from the MIMIC database (version MIMIC-IV 2.2) to create the training set for our model. For external validation, this study used data from sepsis patients complicated by ARDS who met the new global definition of ARDS, sourced from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Lasso regression with cross-validation was used to identify key predictors of patient prognosis. Subsequently, this study established models to predict the 28-day prognosis following ICU admission using various machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, support vector machine classifier, LightGBM, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Model performance was assessed using ROC curves, clinical decision curves (DCA), and calibration curves, while SHAP values were utilized to interpret the machine learning models. Results: A total of 905 patients with sepsis complicated by ARDS were included in our analysis, leading to the selection of 15 key variables for model development. Based on the AUC of the ROC curve, as well as DCA and calibration curve results from the training set, the support vector classifier (SVC) model demonstrated strong performance, achieving an average AUC of 0.792 in the internal validation set and 0.816 in the external validation set. Conclusion: The application of machine learning methodologies to construct prognostic prediction models for sepsis patients complicated by ARDS, informed by the new global definition, proves to be reliable. This approach can assist clinicians in developing personalized treatment strategies for affected patients.

Indexed as

28-dayARDSICU mortalitymachine learningsepsis

Identifiers

PMID41049485
PMCPMC12491239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.