ArticleCrime science2025
BAKE: a novel framework for iterative security design for identifying criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology products.
Article in Crime science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving governance in the age of synthetic biology, artificial intelligence, and diverging threats.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- From pandemics to preparedness: harnessing AI, CRISPR, and synthetic biology to counter biosecurity threats.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging "in-body" monitoring, such as via ingestible devices, promises the future of personalised health, yet discussions of crime and security implications remain of low priority. Here, we develop and deploy the scenario building of the Delphi process and the prototyping of the hackathon through a hybrid hackathon Delphi framework that we have labelled "BAKE". The aim of BAKE is to capture insight from experts regarding the risks posed by these devices; and to produce evidence for the utility of the model as a mechanism to identify at an early stage of design/development, criminally-exploitable vulnerabilities in biotechnology (bio-electronic devices), especially medical products/services. Findings from four expert groups include the identification of four crime forms (e.g., corporate exploitation, data breaches). Five secure by design principles (e.g., end-to-end encryption) and four governance mechanisms (e.g., independent body) were recognised. Four stakeholders were identified (e.g., technical, advocates for equitable treatment). Results indicate that the inclusion of non-traditional experts and early career researchers within the hackathon model can allow the identification of highly challenging threats within the cyber-physical device system. We demonstrated that hosting a hackathon with an embedded Delphi process can instigate secure by design thinking earlier in the product development life cycle of any emerging technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.