ArticlePerspectives of the ASHA special interest groups2025
Demographic and Acoustic Factors related to Automatic Speech Recognition Inaccuracies for Child African American English Speakers.
Article in Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acoustic measures and Google's Speech-to-Text inaccuracies in recognizing speech of children ages 4-9 years who speak African American English (AAE). Methods: Audio recordings were collected from 11 AAE speaking children with speech stimuli targeting final plosive variations observed within the AAE dialect. Dialectal density was measured using the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation Language Screener. Recordings were transcribed using Google's Speech-to-Text application (Google Voice) and inaccuracies were determined through comparison to researcher extracted transcriptions. Acoustic measures from vowels preceding final plosives (including vowel duration, fundamental frequency, average Results: There were no significant differences between inaccuracy rates for voiced and voiceless plosive productions, nor were acoustic measures predictive of speech-to-text inaccuracy. However, age and dialect density were significantly related to voiceless plosive accuracy. Conclusions: The complexities of voice, motor and articulatory development within children can be characterized by acoustic measures. These measures inform acoustic algorithms created for speech technology. Research on acoustic measures in young child AAE speech, with considerations for dialect variability and age, will enhance speech recognition technology and clinical best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.