Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049460›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Epidemiology of Colon Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Setting.

Ena Mahapatra, Romina Kee, Kyungran Shim, Cathy Rowell, William E Trick, David Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ena MahapatraDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Romina KeeDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Kyungran ShimDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
Cathy RowellDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
William E TrickDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.
David GoldbergDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study was aimed to describe the epidemiology of colon cancer screening in an underserved population. This is a cohort study, conducted in a primary care clinic in a safety-net public hospital. Methods: Patients aged 49-78 years were categorized by initial screening status and followed over 28 months. Status was categorized into the following 3 groups with 8 subgroups: screening eligible (up to date or not up to date), non-screening eligible (Personal history of colon cancer, surveillance for colon cancer, work-up in progress, poor health status, and indeterminate), and refusal. Patient egress was defined as no primary care visit for 12 months or <2 primary care visits separated by 60 days over 24 months. Results: Of 1,074 patients reviewed, 856 (80%) were screening eligible, 177 (16%) were non-screening eligible, and 41 (4%) refused screening. Over 28 months, most patients retained in the practice did not change category ( Conclusions: Maintaining a colon cancer registry was complex owing to the dynamic nature of screening status and unstable primary care attendance. Regional integration of electronic health records could substantially reduce manual effort.

Indexed as

Colon cancer screeningelectronic registryprimary care

Identifiers

PMID41049460
PMCPMC12493199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.