Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049396›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2025

Virtual orthopaedic clinic follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty in a tertiary referral centre.

Jack Thomson, Amanda Denton, Will Rudge, David Butt, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth, Addie Majed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jack ThomsonShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-3477
Amanda DentonShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.
Will RudgeShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.
David ButtShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7782-8987
Deborah HiggsShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.
Mark FalworthShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.
Addie MajedShoulder and Elbow, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital Stanmore, Middlesex, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Follow-up for upper limb arthroplasty often requires costly and long-distance travel for patients. This pilot study outlines the process of implementing a virtual clinic (VC) review pathway, and assesses patient satisfaction, safety and costs. Methods: Trust ethics approval was sought prior to implementation. The VC review pathway involved a locally performed X-ray, requested by the general practitioner, followed by a proforma-based telephone questionnaire with a clinical nurse specialist. Following the VC appointment, a telephone satisfaction survey was performed, which included overall satisfaction, a friends and family test, and time for feedback. Conversion back to traditional clinic review and adverse events were recorded. Results: Eighty-four patients were reviewed out of 101 invited. Of those, 89% reported the VC was the same or better than standard follow-up and 93% would recommend the VC to friends or family. There were no adverse events or missed diagnoses recorded. Discussion: This pilot study supports the introduction of a VC review pathway, which provides high satisfaction, reduced cost and no adverse events. Clarifying challenges highlighted by GPs and patients will improve uptake of the pathway. Our institution is now preparing to expand the pathway model to other disciplines.

Indexed as

cost-effectivefollow-up pathwayhealth economicspatient satisfactionupper limb arthroplastyVirtual clinic

Identifiers

PMID41049396
PMCPMC12488605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.