Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049394›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2026

Thoracic reirradiation clinical and technical practices: a survey from the reirradiation Collaborative Group (ReCOG).

Martha M Matuszak, Charles B Simone Ii, Charles K Matrosic, Dawn Owen, Annemarie F Shepherd, Ane Appelt, Charles Mayo, Kelly C Paradis, Ellen Yorke, Nicolaus Andratschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martha M MatuszakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, MI, USA.
Charles B Simone IiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA.
Charles K MatrosicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA.
Dawn OwenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
Annemarie F ShepherdDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, WA, USA.
Ane AppeltDepartment of Medical Physics, Rigshospitalet & Technical University of Denmark, København, Denmark.
Charles MayoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, MI, USA.
Kelly C ParadisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, MI, USA.
Ellen YorkeDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic reirradiation is increasingly used globally, but prospective evidence is scarce, leading to practice based primarily on institutional experience. Recognizing the need for guidance, international multi-professional experts convened at the first Reirradiation Collaborative Group (ReCOG) Meeting. This report presents results from a survey on best practices, challenges, and knowledge gaps among experts on thoracic reirradiation. Methods: A comprehensive 50-question survey was developed by experts and discussed within the thoracic focus group at ReCOG. It included questions on participant demographics and clinical experience, patient-related clinical conditions and selection, imaging and targets, treatment planning, and dose accumulation. Participants were asked for perceived challenges as well as gaps in knowledge. Results: The survey was completed by 34/51 invited experts (67 % response rate). Most respondents (79 %) were experienced physicists and radiation oncologists (>10 years) primarily at university hospitals (65 %). The most common tumors treated were locally recurrent lung cancer, mediastinal nodes, or thoracic metastases. Reirradiation goals included prolonging local control and survival, and alleviating/preventing symptoms. Conditions precluding reirradiation were persistent grade 3+ toxicity and progressive disease. Major toxicity concerns were bleeding, airway injury/fistula, and esophageal ulceration/fistula. Technical practices varied with regards to image registration, dose accumulation and recovery factors. Advanced treatment planning techniques and IGRT were consistent amongst respondents. Major challenges included lack of clinical guidelines and lack of software support tools. Conclusion: Thoracic reirradiation is an increasingly prevalent area of interest despite scarcity of prospective data. The major focus currently still is primarily on treatment-related factors and the question of how to combine reirradiation with systemic therapy. However, there is little guidance on whether and how to modify a planned reirradiation dose based on patient comorbidities or recovery from the prior radiation course. This survey identified emerging areas of consensus as well as relevant variations and gaps in practice.

Indexed as

Lung CancerPractice PatternsReCOGRecurrenceReirradiationRetreatmentSurveyThoracic Cancer

Identifiers

PMID41049394
PMCPMC12495242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.