Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049372›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Development and evaluation of a risk prediction model for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in intensive care units.

Xiaohua Cao, Hua Wang, Yinling Song, Xiangru Yan, Wenjuan Wu, Wenqiang Li, Lulu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaohua Cao *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.
Hua Wang *Department of Hematology, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.
Yinling SongDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.
Xiangru YanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.
Wenjuan WuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.
Wenqiang LiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.
Lulu ChenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jining No. 1 People's Hospital, Jining, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) who receive enteral nutrition (EN) treatment frequently experience feeding intolerance (FI), which, if not promptly managed, can adversely affect treatment outcomes and overall prognosis. This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with enteral nutrition feeding intolerance (ENFI) in critically ill ICU patients and to develop a predictive model to assess the risk of ENFI. Methods: This study enrolled 144 patients, who were categorized into an ENFI group and a non-ENFI group. Variable selection for model development was conducted through univariate analysis, multicollinearity testing, and binary logistic regression. Based on the logistic regression results, a visual predictive model for ENFI risk was constructed using a nomogram. The model's discriminative performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap method with 1,000 resamples of the original dataset. A calibration curve was generated, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was applied to assess the model's calibration accuracy. Results: Based on the results of the binary logistic regression analysis, a nomogram model was developed to predict enteral nutrition feeding intolerance (ENFI) in critically ill ICU patients. The model incorporated five variables: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, mechanical ventilation (MV), albumin (ALB), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and EN start time. AUC was 0.800 (95% confidence interval, 0.725-0.875), with a cutoff value of 0.306. The model demonstrated a sensitivity of 82.5%, specificity of 72.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 67.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.3%. Following internal validation using the bootstrap method, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test produced a χ Conclusion: The model demonstrated good predictive performance and can effectively assess the risk of ENFI in critically ill ICU patients.

Indexed as

critically ill patientsENFIenteral nutrition feeding intoleranceICUsintensive care unitsrisk prediction model

Identifiers

PMID41049372
PMCPMC12488460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.