ArticleCureus2025
Ultrasound Evaluation and Grading of Varicoceles: A Two-Cycle Clinical Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observation or treatment of paediatric varicoceles: revisiting the evidence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Varicoceles are a common cause of male infertility, and ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality used for diagnosis and grading. However, variability in reporting practices can hinder clinical decision-making. This clinical audit aimed to improve adherence to standardized US reporting guidelines for varicoceles, as recommended by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) and the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). Materials and methods A two-cycle retrospective clinical audit was conducted in Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust. Testicular US reports were assessed before and after a targeted intervention that included a multidisciplinary meeting and the implementation of a structured reporting template. Reports were evaluated against ESUR-SPIWG and RCR guidelines, focusing on documentation of testicular volume, varicocele location, largest vein diameter, reflux assessment, and varicocele grading using the Sarteschi classification. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test. Results A total of 66 testicular US reports were reviewed across two audit cycles. Statistically significant improvements were observed post-intervention in the documentation of key parameters (all p < 0.001): testicular volume (0.0% to 91.6%), varicocele location (0% to 91.6%), largest vein diameter (50.0% to 100%), and Valsalva/varicocele grading (0% to 97.2%). Conclusions The introduction of a structured reporting template and interdisciplinary collaboration significantly improved compliance with international varicocele US reporting standards. This approach enhances diagnostic quality and supports more effective urological triage. The findings suggest a scalable model for broader adoption and future integration into electronic systems, promoting consistency, auditability, and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.