Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049243›Full record

ReviewEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)2025

Systematic review of fluorescence-guided surgery in pituitary neuroendocrine tumours.

Christopher Dillon Ovenden, Nicholas Candy, James McNeil, Ryan Beerling Dolovac, Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum, Amer Helal, Sunita De Sousa, Alkis Psaltis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher Dillon OvendenThe University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-7852
Nicholas CandySurgery, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, Australia.
James McNeilNuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8127-3045
Ryan Beerling DolovacThe University of Western Australia Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Perth, Australia.
Mendel Castle-KirszbaumNeurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.
Amer HelalRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Sunita De SousaThe University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-6482
Alkis PsaltisSurgery, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Fluorescence-guided surgery represents a potential novel technique to improve the extent of tumour resection, minimise resection of normal tissue, and optimise outcomes in pituitary neuroendocrine tumour surgery. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on this topic to define the current role for fluorescence-guided surgery in this setting. Design and methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 1st March 2025 for studies investigating the use of exogenous fluorophores or autofluorescence in pituitary surgery. Two authors independently screened studies and extracted data from included studies. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: From 1,604 studies identified, 22 studies involving 297 patients were included. Risk of bias was high in the vast majority of studies. Studies on six exogenous fluorophores were identified (indocyanine green, OTL38, bevacizumab-800CW, chlorin E6 photosensitiser, 5-aminolevulinic acid, and sodium fluorescein), with three studies assessing autofluorescence. Findings of included studies were variable, with small sample sizes and limited outcome reporting. 5-Aminolevulinic acid seems to have little use as a fluorophore in pituitary surgery. The clinical utility of the remaining fluorophores is not yet clearly defined. There are limited data on the utility of autofluorescence in pituitary surgery. Conclusion: At present, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of fluorescence-guided surgery in this setting, prompting the need for further research in this area.

Indexed as

endoscopicfluorescencefluorescence-guided surgerypituitarypituitary adenomapituitary neuroendocrine tumour

Identifiers

PMID41049243
PMCPMC12495904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.