ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Adaptation strategies of
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis of Shading Stress Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Explaining Productivity Differences Among Tree Species via Biotic and Abiotic Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diameter Class-Dependent Species-Specific Tree-Soil Feedback Linked to Soil Quality BetweenPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: This study employed 1-year-old, clonal, Results: (1) Under decreasing light intensity, seedling height to diameter ratio and specific leaf area were 30.10% and 64.38% greater than of those recorded under 100% light intensity. The observed changes in growth maximized light capture capacity. Further, root growth, root to shoot ratio, and seedling quality index decreased with decreasing light intensity. (2) Leaf non-structural carbohydrate contents decreased significantly, along with key carbohydrate-metabolizing enzyme activities, and leaf carbon∶nitrogen and carbon∶phosphorus ratios. (3) High light intensities increased cytokinin and abscisic acid contents, whereas the lowest (5%) light intensity tested enhanced the accumulation of gibberellin, but had no significant effect on indoleacetic acid content. Discussion: These results indicate that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.