Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049165›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2025

Evaluation of spirometric lung function among healthcare professionals working in operating theatres: A comparative cross‑sectional study.

J B Ibrahim, I A Ali, M A Mohammed, I A Ahmed, O A Musa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Spotlight on lung health in operating theatre staff.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J B IbrahimDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Karary University, Omdurman, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2347-4759
I A AliDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8632-0683
M A MohammedDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2314-0905
I A AhmedDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1145-890X
O A MusaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inhalational exposures in the operating theatre, such as waste anaesthetic gases, surgical smoke, airborne particles, microbiological contaminants and cleaning agents, may compromise lung function. Objectives: To evaluate pulmonary function test (PFT) values of operating theatre staff who work in resource-constrained settings. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study included 184 participants (exposed and matched unexposed cohorts). Data were acquired via a structured questionnaire, and the standard procedure was used to calculate each participant's forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV Results: The study cohort comprised 38 surgeons, 28 anaesthetists, 14 scrub nurses and 12 assistants, with a median age of 34 years. The median age for the matched unexposed cohort was 33 years. The healthcare staff had significantly lower FEV Conclusion: The study showed that PFT values were considerably lower among operating theatre healthcare staff than in a matched unexposed group, with measures decreasing as staff experience/duration of exposure rose. Study synopsis:

Indexed as

occupational lung diseasePulmonary function testsspirometryvalueswaste anaesthetic gases

Identifiers

PMID41049165
PMCPMC12490502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.