ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients with Lymph Nodes Metastasis Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymph node (LN) status is a critical prognostic factor for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aims to develop and validate machine learning models to predict LN response in breast cancer patients with LN metastases. Methods: Breast cancer patients who received NAC in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological data, and MRI imaging were collected. Patients were randomly divided into a training set and a testing set in 7:3 ratio. Radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment imaging. Random forests and logistic regression were employed alongside Clinical, Clinical-Radiomics and Clinical-Deep-learning-radiomics (Clinical-DLR) in training set. Model performance was evaluated using metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F1-score. Finally, patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups according to the model with the best performance. Results: Overall, 447 patients were enrolled. In the Clinical, Clinical-Radiomics, and Clinical-DLR logistic regression models, the AUC values in the testing set were 0.738, 0.798, and 0.911, respectively. For the random forest models, the AUC values in the testing set were 0.754, 0.801, and 0.921, respectively. Based on the predictions from the Clinical-DLR model, patients can be stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups. The survival outcomes for high-risk patients were significantly worse compared to those of low-risk patients. Conclusion: The deep learning radiomics offers a promising approach to predict LN status and survival outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC. This could facilitate personalized treatment strategies and improve clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.