Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049147›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Mouse models for enteral and parenteral nutrition after surgery.

Can Kong, Dingsheng Kong, Junjie Hu, Lianggong Liao, Zhiguo Xiong, Tao Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Can Kong *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Dingsheng Kong *Department of General Surgery, Xi'an Eighth's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Junjie Hu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lianggong LiaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhiguo XiongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Tao FuDepartment of General Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to establish a mouse model with different nutritional support modalities [enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition] after abdominal surgery, providing a stable and effective animal model for further study on the intestinal barrier damage caused by total parenteral nutrition. Methods: Twenty mice were randomly assigned to either an enteral nutrition (EN) group ( Results: No difference was found in survival rate ( Conclusion: The mouse model is suitable and effective for investigating the pathogenesis of intestinal barrier dysfunction, as it provides different types of nutritional support after abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

enteral nutritionintestinal barriermouse modeltotal parenteral nutritionZO-1

Identifiers

PMID41049147
PMCPMC12492947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.