Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049143›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Understanding the motivations, deterrents, and incentives for rural Albertan veterinary practice.

Hanna Mughal, Thomas A O'Neill, Lena Le Huray, Megan Bergman, John Remnant, Angelica M Galezowski, Kent G Hecker, Robert McCorkell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanna MughalDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Thomas A O'NeillDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lena Le HurayDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Megan BergmanAlberta Veterinary Medical Association, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
John RemnantFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Angelica M GalezowskiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kent G HeckerFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Robert McCorkellFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The shortage of rural veterinarians is a growing concern globally. This shortage increases the risk of significant negative impacts on livestock management, agriculture, and public health in rural and remote communities. To provide concrete solutions to sustain our rural veterinarian workforce, we examine motivations, incentives, and deterrents to rural veterinary practice (RVP). We do this through a qualitative study in Alberta, Canada, which is a geographically unique and understudied context. Methods: We surveyed veterinary students and practicing veterinarians, obtaining 124 responses. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Results revealed key motivating factors that influence attraction and retention included personal and family considerations that require living in rural contexts, the nature of strong relationships that develop in rural communities, experiencing a range in work factors that enhances professional development, feeling fulfilled by rural veterinary work, and exposure during veterinary school leading to a strong interest in rural settings. Deterrents included limited resources and supports in rural contexts, personal and family needs that require living in urban settings, and challenges inherent to rural communities and environmental characteristics. Finally, key incentives included better salary and benefits, financial incentives, tuition/debt forgiveness, enhanced mentorship, fewer on-call duties, and tailored incentives. Discussion: Strong alignment between student and practicing veterinarian motivations, deterrents, and incentives was observed, extending previous findings that only look at the perceptions of a single group. The results corroborated previous findings, while revealing that the same motivations and deterrents remained important for students and PVs in Alberta's geographically unique context. Finally, they provided key insights to inform policy, practice, and education developments to enhance attraction and retention rates of rural veterinarians, contributing to a path forward for addressing the rural shortage of veterinary services.

Indexed as

educationpolicypracticerural attractionrural practicerural retentionveterinary shortage

Identifiers

PMID41049143
PMCPMC12488401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.