Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049138›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Biosecurity implementation in poultry farms across Europe and neighboring countries: a systematic review.

Ronald Vougat Ngom, Marta Leite, Giuditta Tilli, Andrea Laconi, Qamer Mahmood, Jasna Prodanov-Radulović, Alberto Allepuz, Ilias Chantziaras, Alessandra Piccirillo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronald Vougat Ngom *Department of Animal Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Ngaoundere, Cameroon.
Marta Leite *Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry (LAQV) of the Network of Chemistry and Technology (REQUIMTE), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Giuditta TilliDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale Legnaro, Italy.
Andrea LaconiDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale Legnaro, Italy.
Qamer MahmoodVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Jasna Prodanov-RadulovićScientific Veterinary Institute Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Alberto AllepuzDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Ilias ChantziarasDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandra PiccirilloDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale Legnaro, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Modern poultry production systems inherently concentrate large numbers of birds, which also increases the risk and potential impact of disease outbreaks. Biosecurity is widely recognized as the most important tool for reducing the risk of disease introduction, establishment, and spread to, within, and from an animal population. Thus, effective biosecurity is essential for sustainable poultry production, and assessing its implementation represents a crucial step. This systematic review aimed to evaluate biosecurity implementation in poultry farms across European and neighboring countries. Methods: The Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed to perform the systematic review. Results: Of the 1,515 articles retrieved from four databases, only 44 met the inclusion criteria and 16 provided usable data for assessing biosecurity implementation. Despite relatively broad geographical coverage, including eight multi-country studies involving 36 national assessments, the distribution of studies was uneven. Moreover, most studies (77%) were pathogen- or disease-specific (e.g., Discussion: The heterogeneity of results, driven by differences in study design, poultry species, production systems, and methodological approach, highlights the complexity of evaluating biosecurity across diverse national contexts. This variability may reflect differences in epidemiological conditions, research funding, and national priorities. Although this review focused solely on primary research studies, the findings underscore the need to promote cross-country collaboration to enhance knowledge sharing and data harmonization.

Indexed as

assessmentbiosecurityEuropeIsraelpoultrypreventionTunisiaTurkey

Identifiers

PMID41049138
PMCPMC12491017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.