ArticleJournal of patient experience2025
Caregiver Impact and Understanding of Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research brief collected quantitative data on the impact of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening, including follow-up eye care. In total, 37 survey responses from caregivers of infants who underwent ROP screening at UCLA Medical Centers between January 1, 2011 and February first, 2021 were included, and 17 (46%) of the infants had ROP. In total, 36 (98%) caregivers remembered their child undergoing ROP screening and accurately recalled why their child received the screening along with the outcome. More caregivers of children with ROP reported significant family impact from caring for their preterm child, including having to give things up [10 (59%) versus 3 (15%);
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.