ReviewFood engineering reviews2025
Mapping the AI Landscape in Food Science and Engineering: A Bibliometric Analysis Enhanced with Interactive Digital Tools and Company Case Studies.
Review in Food engineering reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of research on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in food science and engineering has made it increasingly difficult to synthesise relevant insights effectively. Although AI adoption in the food industry has grown, it lags behind sectors like finance and healthcare due to the complexity of food systems, including high process variability, risk aversion towards novel technologies, and constrained investment appetite. Historically, computational techniques and AI-adjacent technologies like expert systems and empirical modelling have supported food research and development for decades. More recently, AI applications have broadened to include process control, food safety, ingredient and product quality, sensory evaluation, traceability, and supply chain management. In response to the rapid increase in AI-related food science publications - particularly since 2019 - this review introduces tools for dynamically synthesising and exploring this evolving knowledge base. We present an interactive dashboard that integrates a curated dataset of food AI review articles with advanced bibliometric analyses, enabling user-driven exploration of research trends and thematic relationships. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of customised large language model (LLM) tools for targeted literature interrogation, enhancing accessibility for researchers and industry stakeholders. Complementing this academic synthesis, we profile selected industry case studies where AI plays a central role in ingredient discovery, product development, intelligent sorting, and sensory analytics. By combining interactive research tools with real-world case studies, this review offers a comprehensive snapshot of Food AI and begins to bridge the gap between academic research and industry implementation, providing a valuable resource for those seeking both domain-specific knowledge and actionable insights. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12393-025-09413-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.