Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41049049›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025

EndoEx: Benchtop and cadaveric evaluation of a novel endograft removal device.

Brandon Look Fong, Rishik Puppala, Zain Moin, Alayne Morrel, Maham Rahimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon Look FongSchool of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX.
Rishik PuppalaSchool of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX.
Zain MoinSchool of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX.
Alayne MorrelSchool of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX.
Maham RahimiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has improved short-term patient outcomes as compared with open techniques. However, endograft complications, particularly infection and endoleaks, may necessitate the removal of the graft and fixation spines. Current explanation techniques are limited, often relying on repurposed tools like modified syringes, which can damage the aortic wall or nearby vessels during removal and lead to serious complications, such as aortic dissection, renal injury, and catastrophic bleeding, with mortality rates of up to 30%. In response, the EndoEx device was developed, designed specifically for safe and controlled graft removal, especially regarding the suprarenal fixation spines. The device uses specific geometry and features designed to limit the mechanical damage associated with vessel trauma and improve ease of use. This study compared EndoEx with the current standard of care, a modified syringe, through benchtop hydrogel testing, ex vivo bovine aorta models, and cadaveric explantation of suprarenal Cook stent grafts. EndoEx showed a smaller damaged surface area in benchtop hydrogel testing as compared with the modified syringe (0 ± 0 cm

Indexed as

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairEndograftEndoleakExplantation

Identifiers

PMID41049049
PMCPMC12494843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.