ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2025
EndoEx: Benchtop and cadaveric evaluation of a novel endograft removal device.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanism-guided endograft explantation eliminates shear-mediated aortic injury in a controlled simulation study.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has improved short-term patient outcomes as compared with open techniques. However, endograft complications, particularly infection and endoleaks, may necessitate the removal of the graft and fixation spines. Current explanation techniques are limited, often relying on repurposed tools like modified syringes, which can damage the aortic wall or nearby vessels during removal and lead to serious complications, such as aortic dissection, renal injury, and catastrophic bleeding, with mortality rates of up to 30%. In response, the EndoEx device was developed, designed specifically for safe and controlled graft removal, especially regarding the suprarenal fixation spines. The device uses specific geometry and features designed to limit the mechanical damage associated with vessel trauma and improve ease of use. This study compared EndoEx with the current standard of care, a modified syringe, through benchtop hydrogel testing, ex vivo bovine aorta models, and cadaveric explantation of suprarenal Cook stent grafts. EndoEx showed a smaller damaged surface area in benchtop hydrogel testing as compared with the modified syringe (0 ± 0 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.