ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
Functional Coupling and Longitudinal Outcome Prediction in First-Episode Psychosis.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical outcomes following the first episode of psychosis (FEP) are highly heterogeneous across patients. The identification of prognostic biomarkers would greatly facilitate personalized treatments. Patients with psychosis often display brainwide disruptions of interregional functional coupling (FC), with some being linked to symptom severity and remission. Thus, FC may have prognostic potential for people experiencing psychosis. Methods: Fifty-five antipsychotic-naïve patients with FEP (51% female, ages 15-25 years) were randomized to receive either antipsychotic or placebo tablets for 6 months alongside psychosocial interventions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was conducted at baseline and after 3 months to evaluate whether baseline FC or 3-month change in FC could predict 6- and 12-month changes in symptoms and functioning, quantified using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, respectively. We considered 3 different cross-validated prediction algorithms: 1) connectome-based predictive modeling, 2) kernel ridge regression, and 3) multilayer meta-matching. Each prediction model comprised 35 to 49 individuals. Results: All models showed poor performance in predicting patients' 6- and 12-month changes in symptoms and functioning (all Conclusions: Our findings suggest that brainwide measures of FC may not be suitable for predicting extended clinical outcomes over a 6- to 12-month period in patients with FEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.