ArticleData in brief2025
FAIRness and data quality assessment of urban air quality monitoring datasets: Perspective on insights from F-UJI evaluation.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in information technology have supported the open availability of environmental monitoring datasets to aid global initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Despite these efforts, challenges concerning data quality and adherence to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles continue to restrict the effective reuse of such datasets, particularly for secondary applications. This study uses the F-UJI assessment tool and a set of eight established DQ dimensions to evaluate the FAIRness and Data Quality (DQ) of four publicly available urban air quality monitoring datasets from international agencies. Each dataset was assessed against 17 FAIR metrics and scored accordingly. The FAIR assessments revealed moderate to low levels of compliance across datasets, with Reusable scores ranging from 2 to 3 out of 10, and Interoperability often being the weakest dimension. DQ analysis showed recurring issues in consistency, completeness, interpretability, and traceability, particularly where metadata was poorly structured or lacked semantic depth. While the scope is limited to four datasets, the results highlight common structural and semantic deficiencies hindering data reuse. Based on these findings, the study offers targeted recommendations to support improved metadata practices and better alignment with FAIR principles within the air quality monitoring subdomain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.