ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The experience and discharge readiness of patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The discharge readiness for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) patients are designed to facilitate their transition from hospital to home and support early rehabilitation, ultimately improving discharge quality and outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the experiences and discharge readiness of patients undergoing MBS. Setting: A Tertiary hospital, China. Methods: An empirical phenomenological approach was used. Eighteen participants were recruited in Wuhan using convenience sampling. Semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted in May 2024. Each interview was transcribed verbatim, and Colaizzi's method was used to analyze the data. Results: Five themes emerged from data analysis: post-surgical adaptation and expectations; negative emotions and stigma; knowledge gaps and ongoing education needs; post-discharge self-management and support needs; navigating physical recovery and long-term life planning. Patients faced both physiological and psychological discomfort. Insufficient social support was due to gaps in self-management knowledge and biased perceptions of reintegration. The surgery also impacted their reintegration into society and family life, while the long-term effect encouraged patients to adopt positive coping strategies and seek external support. Family provided primary support, but ongoing professional medical guidance was crucial for successful recovery and reintegration. Conclusion: The discharge readiness of the patient needs to be appreciated and improved. Developing a specific scale to assess readiness for MBS patients are crucial. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered discharge support system, supported by an information platform, should provide real-time, practical guidance for rehabilitation. Furthermore, establishing an effective post-discharge linkage mechanism will enhance self-management and ensure access to appropriate medical and social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.