ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Incidence, risk factors and evolving treatment of severe retinopathy of prematurity in China: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in 70 neonatal intensive care units.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the current incidence, risk factors and treatment for severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in very preterm infants in China. Methods: This was a descriptive, retrospective cohort study. The study population was very preterm infants admitted to one of the 70 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Chinese Neonatal Network who underwent ROP screening between January 2019 and December 2020. The primary outcome was severe ROP, defined as type 1 or type 2 ROP. Potential risk factors were identified based on prior evidence and statistical significance. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. Results: This study included 14,670 very preterm infants, among which 17.3% had low-grade ROP, and 8.5% had severe ROP. Treatment was performed in 1,381 (4.7%) eyes of the infants, among which 1,029 (74.5%), 148 (10.7%), and 124 (9.0%) received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection only, laser treatment only, and vitreoretinal surgery, respectively. Extremely preterm birth (7.61, 95% CI: 6.12-9.46), small for gestational age (SGA; 2.31, 95% CI: 1.71-3.12), outborn status (1.43, 95% CI: 1.22-1.67), 1-min Apgar score < 7 (1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.51), >40 days on oxygen (1.70, 95% CI: 1.37-2.10), >28 days on parenteral nutrition (PN; 1.17, 95% CI: 1-1.35), and any inotropes use (2.12, 95% CI: 1.82-2.46) were associated with increased odds of severe ROP. Antenatal steroid use (0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.91), large for gestational age (LGA; 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.85), and surfactant treatment (0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.87) were associated with reduced odds of severe ROP. Conclusion: The incidence of severe ROP in very preterm infants in China was high compared to the developed countries, and intravitreal anti-VEGF injection was the preferred treatment for severe ROP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.