ArticleSafety and health at work2025
Development and Application of Standard Codes for the National Exposure Surveillance System Utilizing Korea's Nationwide Exposure Database.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Work Environment Measurement Database (WEMD) is a valuable system for occupational exposure surveillance. However, its use is limited due to the lack of proper standardization of exposure-related variables. Hence, we developed a new standard process classification (SPC), standard occupation classification (SOC), and exposure condition category (ECOC) codes to establish an exposure surveillance system using the WEMD. Additionally, we assessed the feasibility of constructing a job-exposure matrix (JEM) using standardized codes. Methods: The SPC and SOC were reclassified based on similarity from an exposure perspective, using established codes refined through reviews by industrial hygiene experts. The ECOC codes were based on the conceptual exposure assessment model. Ten experts conducted a pilot project to evaluate the applicability of the newly reclassified SPC, SOC, and ECOC codes. Results: We developed 77 SPC, 82 SOC, and 12 ECOC codes, which were assigned to over 98% of the data by experts, demonstrating their practical applicability. A JEM linking industry, occupation, process, and exposure condition was constructed into an interactive dashboard based on expert evaluations, demonstrating feasibility and enabling better interpretation of exposure levels through user-controlled variables. Exposure levels varied significantly across ECOC groups, showing a clear linear trend with higher exposures in conditions representing greater exposure potential, such as proximity to the source and lack of control measures. Conclusion: The newly developed standardized codes are easily applicable by industrial hygienists and can be integrated into the WEMD, supporting its expected use as an exposure surveillance system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.