Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048770›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Tough PEGDA-Based Bioadhesive Hydrogels for High-Strength In Situ Cartilage Adhesion.

Kerem Veral, Rumeysa Tutar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kerem VeralDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Avcılar, Istanbul 34320, Turkey.
Rumeysa TutarDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Avcılar, Istanbul 34320, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-424X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injuries to articular cartilage present considerable difficulty in musculoskeletal medicine owing to the tissue's restricted regenerative capacity. This study sought to formulate and assess adhesive hydrogels to improve both adhesive and cohesive strengths for cartilage injuries. Injectable and in situ double-cross-linkable polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA)-based bioadhesive hydrogels aim to substantially improve the adhesion strength for the repair of cartilage injuries. PEGDA was prepared by adding acrylate groups to polyethylene glycol (PEG), whereas methacrylated alginate (AlgMA) was created by adding methacrylate groups to alginate. The PEG was altered to enhance its mechanical and adhesive characteristics. PEGDA was subsequently combined with AlgMA to enhance its cohesive characteristics. When the amine thiol in the cartilage tissue interacts with the PEGDA/AlgMA framework, it creates amide bonds and thioesters. The bioadhesives were carefully tested for their physical and chemical properties, how much they swell, how they break down over time, and how strong they are, including tests for pressure and how well they close wounds both in vitro and ex vivo. As a result, our improved hydrogel formulas showed ex vivo burst pressure of up to 194.5 ± 8.5 kPa and 335.5 ± 3.5 kPa lap shear, with wound closure strengths of 643.5 ± 46 kPa in vitro and 138 ± 8.5 kPa in tests ex vivonumbers that are much higher than those of clinical fibrin adhesives and other similar materials. These results demonstrate that our composite hydrogel technology is a better bioactive adhesive for cartilage tissue sealing. Our findings will enhance the expanding research on nature-inspired biomaterials and pave the way for the clinical application of next-generation bioadhesives.

Identifiers

PMID41048770
PMCPMC12489722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.