Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41048712›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvaria Using 3D-Printed Scaffolds with Graded Porosity and In Vitro Degradation.

Lucía Pérez-Sánchez, Mariana Nataly Carbajal-Casique, Rafael Álvarez-Chimal, Marco A Alvarez-Perez, Juan José Montesinos, Monserrat Llaguno-Munive, Janeth Serrano-Bello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucía Pérez-SánchezLaboratorio de Bioingeniería de Tejidos, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n. Cd. Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, México.
Mariana Nataly Carbajal-CasiqueLaboratorio de Bioingeniería de Tejidos, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n. Cd. Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, México.
Rafael Álvarez-ChimalLaboratorio de Bioingeniería de Tejidos, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n. Cd. Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, México.
Marco A Alvarez-PerezLaboratorio de Bioingeniería de Tejidos, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n. Cd. Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, México.
Juan José MontesinosMesenchymal Stem Cells Laboratory, Oncology Research Unit, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center (IMSS), Mexico City 06720, Mexico.
Monserrat Llaguno-MuniveLaboratorio de Física Médica, Subdirección de Investigación Básica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, México.
Janeth Serrano-BelloLaboratorio de Bioingeniería de Tejidos, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n. Cd. Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1506-9575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniofacial bone defects present a significant clinical challenge due to their structural complexity and potential neurological implications. In this study, a three-dimensional (3D) polylactic acid (PLA) scaffold with graded porosity and three pore types was fabricated and subjected to a controlled in vitro degradation process. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), which are known for their osteogenic potential, were seeded on the scaffolds to evaluate their osteoconductive performance in a critical-size calvarial defect model in Wistar rats. In vitro assays revealed no significant changes in surface morphology, weight, pH, and mechanical properties over 0, 60, 100, 140, and 180 days of degradation. However, scaffolds degraded for 60 days demonstrated enhanced biological activity in cell-based assays and were therefore selected for in vivo implantation. Microcomputed tomography and bone mineral density analysis indicated that the group receiving degraded scaffolds without cells exhibited the most substantial new bone formation, suggesting effective osteoconductive properties. These findings represent a promising step toward translational medicine and highlight the potential for clinical application, pending further preclinical validation.

Identifiers

PMID41048712
PMCPMC12489623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.