ArticleACS omega2025
Ultrahigh Temperature Purification of Graphite for the Development of a Continuous Process.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work presents a study of ultrahigh temperature purification of natural Canadian graphite flakes. The concentrated natural graphite flakes were purified using two test facilities, an ultrahigh temperature fixed bed furnace and an ultrahigh temperature fast-heating counterflow reactor. With the fixed bed furnace, the natural graphite flakes were purified at 2500 or 2800 °C for 15-120 min. With the counterflow reactor, the residence time was ∼20-25 min, with an average temperature of 2700 °C and higher local temperatures due to electric arcing. The heat-treated samples were characterized by using several different analysis techniques. The results showed that the samples treated with the fast-heating counterflow reactor reached a very high purity above 99.9 wt % carbon. The samples treated at 2800 °C in the fixed bed furnace reached a similar purity. At the lower temperature of 2500 °C, a similar purity could only be achieved with a duration of at least 60 min. Four elemental analysis techniques to quantify impurities in graphite were evaluated in this work, with a focus on elements that disrupt the performance of Li-ion batteries, such as magnesium, aluminum, iron, copper, and silicon. The analysis results with the original graphite flakes and the heat-treated graphite flakes showed that significant differences exist among the various analysis techniques. For some critical elements, such as iron and silicon, the detected concentrations could differ by more than 1 order of magnitude.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.