ArticleAACE endocrinology and diabetes
Enhancing Diabetes Management in Remote Regions: Insulin Pump Adaption and Safety in the Faroe Islands.
Article in AACE endocrinology and diabetes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objective: Insulin pump therapy (IPT) is increasingly used in the management of type 1 diabetes, including in remote areas such as the Faroe Islands, where access to diabetes technology is universally reimbursed. However, evidence on its effectiveness in such settings remains limited. This study compared glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), complications, and renal outcomes between users of IPT and multiple daily injections (MDI). Case Report: We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional, registry-based study in the Faroe Islands, linking electronic medical records, prescription data, and laboratory results. Discussion: Continuous glucose monitoring was used by 92% of participants, and IPT by 50%, primarily hybrid closed-loop systems. Despite higher IPT use among younger individuals, longer diabetes duration was also associated with increased IPT use, suggesting it is often initiated in those with established T1D following challenges with MDI. HbA1c levels did not differ significantly between groups, but severely increased albuminuria was more common in MDI users, while IPT users had better-preserved renal function. Overall, 42% of participants achieved an HbA1c below 53 mmol/mol (7%). Conclusion: In this setting with broad access to diabetes technology, both IPT and MDI supported effective glycemic control, with possible renal benefits observed among insulin pump therapy users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.